Hunter vs PestPac

A PestPac alternative built in Australia, not adapted for it

PestPac is one of the longest-running pest control platforms in North America. Hunter is the same idea rebuilt for Australia — state pesticide records, AU licensing and an AI agent, with nothing to implement.

Best for: Large North American pest control operations

Last reviewed

The short version

PestPac has been running US pest control businesses for a long time, and at that scale the depth is real. It is also unmistakably a North American product: the regulatory model, the terminology and the accounting stack all assume a US operator, and getting started means a sales conversation and an implementation rather than a signup. Hunter gives an Australian operator that depth on day one.

One thing to get out of the way before the table: Hunter is not sold the way the products on this page are. They are software licensed per user, which you configure and then operate. Hunter is a crew of AI employees installed with you — the work of answering, quoting, chasing and reporting is done by the system rather than by staff using it — so it is priced as one thing against what that work costs you today, not per seat. That makes a row-by-row feature comparison useful and a price comparison meaningless, which is why there isn't one. What it costs is on the pricing page and in full on the call.

CapabilityHunterPestPac
Built for AU pest controlPurpose-builtUS pest control platform
Per-state compliance recordsBuilt in (NSW·VIC·QLD·WA·SA·TAS·ACT·NT)US regulatory model
AI agent for quotes & commsIncludedAutomation & reporting tools
Recurring & maintenance plannerIncludedRecurring service plans
Xero & QuickBooks syncIncludedUS ledgers (QuickBooks)
Getting startedImplementation included — we move your data and configure it with youImplementation, quoted separately
What you're buyingA managed AI crew, priced as oneUS pest-control software, sold through a sales and implementation process

Where PestPac falls short

PestPac is built around North American regulatory reporting. There is no Australian per-state pesticide record schema, no AU technician licence register and no AS 3660 or AS 4349.3 document set — for an Australian operator those become custom fields you design, populate and police yourself.

It is also sold and supported from North America: product and support hours follow the US day, and the accounting integrations assume a US ledger. Onboarding is an implementation, which is the right shape for software this deep — the question is who does it and what it is built on, and in PestPac's case it is configured against a regulatory model that isn't yours.

Why Australian pest control teams choose Hunter

Hunter is what an Australian pest control operator needs on the first morning, not after a rollout:

  • Per-state compliance records for NSW, VIC, QLD, WA, SA, TAS, ACT and NT
  • Australian technician licences and chemical records tracked as first-class data
  • An AI agent that quotes, schedules and handles customer comms
  • Australian support in your own timezone
  • An implementation done with you, against Australian rules, not configured onto a US one

Other comparisons

Apply

Run your whole business from one place

Fifteen minutes on your own kind of work. If it fits, we set it up with you.

Implementation included · No lock-in contracts · Built for NSW, VIC, QLD, WA, SA, TAS, ACT & NT